Narcissistic Personality Disorder at RISK in Polygamous Families

#41
Ohhhhhh.

I think from what you are saying you're one of those that believes that there isn't really material scarcity in the world and that human competition is the sole cause of scarcity.
Cruel dirty rotten disobedience to God tactics implemented into competition is, not simply "human competition".


Well that makes a lot of your posts make sense, but I'm sorry, you're going to have to prove that is the case. I suggest you prove it by going out into the woods to live a hunter/gatherer lifestyle yourself for a while and see just how easy it is. :cool:
I'll take that to suggest you're not too fond of most Indigneous nomadic peoples of North America and South America, nor think too highly of them before they interacted with Europeans and their African slaves?

'Cause until you prove to me that you can live a hunter-gatherer lifestyle without taking any dangerous risks, you won't convince me that polygamy was not necessary at some point in time, and until you go out and experience that lifestyle for yourself, I won't convince you on the matter either.
"dangerous risks" ?

How dangerous is hunting Buffalo where there is vast herds of them if its easy enough to learn to build a spear, a bow and some arrows, and then accurately shoot and throw those weapons to harvest enough of the Buffalos to feed your entire tribe and have surplus year after year after year?

But when a parasite tribe from across a continent commits scorched earth genocide tactics? And never stops, . . . what kind of extreme "dangerous risks" do you really expect?


Funny little musings on the whole Polygamy rationale: American Indian genocide and a little jewish actor (reaping the spoils of war), the irony that Christopher Columbus was a Jew, and the same ole' (reaping the spoils the of the remaining squaws). Essentially this is yeat another one of hollywood's b.s. little propagandas " to the victor goes the spoils" rational for the whole less than ideal survival mode that "polygamy was necessary" case, rather than the scarcity derived from unnecessary cruel beast like competition.
 
Last edited:
Nov 2015
144
Canada
#42
you never offered anything to make a grade to know what you're even talking about except another context muddle
I don't claim to even really be part of this conversation. I just see that your arguments are degrading because you can't defend them, and pointed it out.

You're not innocent here either. Material scarcity?
ReturnofZealSeeker said:
Cruel dirty rotten disobedience to God tactics implemented into competition is, not simply "human competition".
I just think you are sounding a little insane here and effectively attacking people because they have arguments and points that disagree with your small, small safety bubble, and the reason I have not spoken much to you is because frankly I do not have the immense patience that Tonyfish and Walrus seem to be displaying.
 
#43
I just think you are sounding a little insane here and effectively attacking people because they have arguments and points that disagree with your small, small safety bubble, and the reason I have not spoken much to you is because frankly I do not have the immense patience that Tonyfish and Walrus seem to be displaying.
Why do you think I'm sounding insane? I bet you can't even explain what you think without proving yourself sounding pretty insane here.
 
#45
quoting Saveyist
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2015
From: Canada
Posts: 131

I'm sorry but YOUR POINT DOES NOT become more valid WHEN YOU TYPE IT like this. It just makes you sound EDGY!

Also I'd love to hear your response to what Walrus asked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus
But in the ancient era, where there are going to be more men that die than women, what is your alternate solution?? I'm still awaiting one.
I don't answer loaded questions loaded with assumptions. You're asking about a bunch of hypothetical speculative hypothetical bullcrap. But when persistent little insulting jabs start getting thrown, well I guess a context is due to re-clarify for those too lazy to even have a clue of thought other than ego-reaction to me proclaiming polygamy is not as necessary as you might think Walrus and his sidekick "senior member from Canada". HYPOTHETICALLY in A BRUTAL BRUTAL primitive society of Hunter Gatherers: If the men of a society are droppping like flies hunting wooly mammoths and getting mauled by saber tooth tigers, to where there's like 1 man to 3 women, at what point do the women learn to hunt better or the whole tribe starve anyways? As though they have nothing better to do except lay on their backed and spread their legs and get impregnated more and more?
 
Oct 2014
1,787
Stockholm
#46
Well, I'm reminded of the saying "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is likely to be a duck" But in the case of the starter of this thread, he certainly talks like a Bahá'i, but he didn't absorb much of the spirit, including respectfulness, consideration, courtesy and detachment. That's why I find these discussions rather boring.

Best,

from

gnat
 
#47
Well, I'm reminded of the saying "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is likely to be a duck" But in the case of the starter of this thread, he certainly talks like a Bahá'i, but he didn't absorb much of the spirit, including respectfulness, consideration, courtesy and detachment. That's why I find these discussions rather boring.

Best,

from

gnat
but exciting enough for you to read and respond
 
Jun 2014
1,044
Wisconsin
#50
Cruel dirty rotten disobedience to God tactics implemented into competition is, not simply "human competition".

I'll take that to suggest you're not too fond of most Indigneous nomadic peoples of North America and South America, nor think too highly of them before they interacted with Europeans and their African slaves?
No I respect their cultures, and from that respect I have the knowledge they did not live in the manner you describe. Do you think their lives was free of struggle?? Hah!! You haven't talked to any Inuit, I take it.

"dangerous risks" ?

How dangerous is hunting Buffalo where there is vast herds of them if its easy enough to learn to build a spear, a bow and some arrows, and then accurately shoot and throw those weapons to harvest enough of the Buffalos to feed your entire tribe and have surplus year after year after year?
That's a laughable counterargument.

You're arguing how easy it was to hunt bison by posting a video about the decimation of the bison after the introduction of firearms and horses. ;)

Hunting bison is by no means easy or simple, which is why Amerindians had to get clever to hunt the creatures. You might want to read From the Heart of the Crow Country. The Crow Indians' Own Stories by Joseph Medicine Crow which notes the many hunting methods.
 
Last edited:
Similiar Baha'i Discussions Forum Date
Baha'i Discussions

Similar threads