Ok, then I will cite myselfI was only trying to discuss how it is possible faiths can be one yet at the same time appear different by applying my understanding of the teachings of Baha'u'llah and also of linguistics and how language works. I apologize if I misunderstood your question. Perhaps you could restate it? I will try and answer a specific question if I am able.
If there is a progressive revelation, why gives the older revelation of Krishna more detailed information about after life and the processes within the material and spiritual worlds than the new revelation of Bahá’u’lláh?
In hinduism, there are also prophets for the current age, their teachings are according to the Vedas (so you can proof that they are true), and they have renewed the principles according to Time, Space and Circumstances, why not follow them?